Back to basics and some harsh realities:
"I got denied at ALJ level in October 2013... So I applied for SSDI disability again 2 weeks ago and got my denial letter today due to 'no new evidence.'" Original Post this thread.
The applicant's Social Security Disability Insurance policy expired, or lapsed, March 31, 2013. (This is called the Date Last Insured.) The decision from the ALJ occurred October ??, 2013, or after the insurance policy expired (DLI). A new application for SSDI must, by law, set the new Alleged Onset Date no earlier than the day after the date of the ALJ decision. Any application for SSDI with an AOD after the insurance policy expired (March 31, 2013) will be rejected (denied) without reviewing the medical evidence. Period, end of story - case closed.
What the Vocational Expert did/did not say in the Hearing does not matter. The ALJ ruled that the applicant's condition did not meet the requirements of the SSA definition of disability and denied the application. That decision was not appealed and stands.
The applicant had the right to appeal the ALJ decision all the way to the US Supreme Court. Had the case been appealed, it is possible that case would still be an open case in litigation. The new diagnoses and how these conditions affected function at the time of the original AOD through the DLY, could have been introduced during the extended appeal process. Since that did not happen, the original case is closed, water under the bridge, and cannot be reopened with a new application.
The quick denial can be explained by the fact that the application was, as the writer suggests, denied without a medical review. There would be no reason for SSA to medically review the case because the applicant was not insured for SSDI benefits as of the new, legally defined, AOD and could not receive benefits even if found medically disabled.
Since the applicant does not qualify for Supplemental Security Income payments (Reply #3), there is no case to be pursued.
Harsh, yes - but the law is the law.